Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | hamasho's commentslogin

I think that nihilistic sentiment arises only when you are materially satisfied, maybe in the 90s and 00s (like office workers in Fight Club or Office Space). Many of us are in survival mode now. We just need money to keep up with inflation. We don't have time to think about the deep meaning of life.

"Survival mode" is quite an overstatement of current conditions for most people in most of the West. Prices have risen, but people aren't in as rough of a position as 2008, 1970's stagflation, or certainly the great depression.

Yes, if anything we are over fed and awash in consumer goods.

AI-generated content should have the same amount of copyright as prompt texts. You can't claim copyright for the text "Rock music with angry vocals and 160 bpm with a guitar solo".

But I think training models using copyrighted content is stealing in the first place. It's not fair use, so it should be banned entirely.


> AI-generated content should have the same amount of copyright as prompt texts.

That's about right currently.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-supreme-court-de...

"Plaintiff Stephen Thaler had appealed to the justices after lower courts upheld a U.S. Copyright Office decision that the AI-crafted visual art at issue in the case was ineligible for copyright protection because it did not have a human creator."


I have great news for you.

It has even less copyright. A prompt text you write, if sufficiently creative enough, is copyrighted. The output of an AI, no matter how “creative”, is always pubic domain.

https://sciactive.com/human-contribution-policy/#More-Inform...


pubic domain.

Only certain types of AI output.


It makes sense. And Google is its own way to name all AI products “Gemini”.

Which is unusually simple. I would expect Google to use 10 more marketing names simultaneously without any logic to the product lines.

Next year they will introduce "hAIngouts" as an AI chat bot.

Ouch. Maybe "Google wAIve" for collaborative chats.

> Which is unusually simple. I would expect Google to use 10 more marketing names simultaneously without any logic to the product lines.

I think they were lucky this time that they landed a good name after only a few iterations that has since stuck.

Anyone remember Google Bard or LaMDA?


The r/Bard subreddit is still quite active for some reason. Reminds me of Google Glass.

I still like the name Bard

Didn't it start as Bard?

Well it depends on what you're talking about. The model names were originally called lambda, followed by palm and then finally gemini. The chatbot product was internally known as meena, launched as Bard, and then transitioned to Gemini once the Gemini model came out.

They’ve improved it since the initial launch when the service, model names and plan names all sounded similar and contradictory.

there is vertex ai, notebooklm, antigravity, nano banana, veo, lyria, the open models are gemma and gato

But they put Gemini in google docs, they didn’t rename Docs to Gemini like Microsoft did.

And IBM has "Watson"

SAP sales reps used HANA for "cloud" in the beginning... Which was bs back then and is today. But while everybody wanted to be in the cloud, SAP sales was scared to not be with the cool kids, when they do not somehow add to the cloud talk

And Silly has Silly!

Probably will use other astrology terms. Like the way android is named for desserts.

Google Scorpio will be their best model yet, except sometimes it will say things that cut you to the core.

It most certainly isn't astrology that was on Google's mind when they decided for Gemini.


I think they'll more likely launch competing AI projects like 'Aquarius' and 'Doh' or something

It doesn’t make sense. Google has a least its own LLMs, MS just uses others. So Copilot could be OpenAI or Anthropic.

At work we have licenses for Copilot and Copilot but not Copilot and everyone gets Copilot but only some get Copilot.


Why don’t you just query Palantir DB by your human ID? It shows your entire life data and much more.


That made me laugh, but it was a sad laugh, because it is true.


can't afford a subscription


Hmm.. so this is not the same category with computer use or browser use. I love the idea. Well defined and controlled sandbox is really useful. Off topic but I’m disappointed by computer use and browser use when I tried three months ago. They couldn’t complete many basic tasks. Especially browser use, it easily failed slightly unorthodox website. It can’t find select box implemented by div, stacks in infinite loop when the submit button is disabled, and it even failed to complete the demo in its own readme! I’m okay with open source projects a bit buggy, but a VC funded company, which already has the fancy landing page, provides the service to big corps, and offers paid plans, should at least make sure the demo works.


I grew up on a small village in a small island. The yogurt lady was an essential part of the community.

Many stay-at-home moms (including my mom) seemed to enjoy her visit. She and my mom talked a lot, sometimes for hours (I still can't figure out how she completed her job when she spent so much time with one person). They chatted about recent events, like the daughter of the fisherman gave birth, the great-grandpa of the liquor shop died of cancer, a newly opened restaurant in the nearest town sucked, and sometimes shared even personal struggles or family matters. It really helped a lot of people combat mental struggles caused by the isolation of being traditional stay-at-home wives in a super rural area. The only downside was anything you shared with her would be spread in the entire village before dawn.


This is one for https://news.ycombinator.com/highlights

(I mention this so more people can know the list exists, and hopefully email us more nominations)


I love this! Thank you. I spent way too much time on HN this week, so I'd already enjoyed several of these, but this is a great showcase of the content that keeps me coming back here.


@dang, how do you curate these? Manually?

Have you thought about sourcing these by looking at the most favorited comments per week?


Manually, some by ourselves and some nominated by readers.

That's a good idea btw - here are some of the most-favorited comments from this past week:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47258500

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47238442

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47237467

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47232961

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47226535

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47214629

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47210627

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47206393

Only a couple of those were already in /highlights.

I'm not sure yet whether this is good enough to be an automatic feed into /highlights but I could imagine adding aggregated /favorites pages to https://news.ycombinator.com/lists.


@dang: these are amazing! Real useful gems... I think they are different than the highlight ones, seems like people favorite them because of their utility mostly.

Would love to see it as /favorites in the lists page!


Thanks! Didn’t know this existed.


> The only downside was anything you shared with her would be spread in the entire village before dawn

It's a better service than FB or Instagram that depress because people only show their good sides there... As you said, she was an essential part of the community ;-)


> It's a better service than FB or Instagram that depress because people only show their good sides there...

Sadly it's not only that. Social networks are "half-duplex" where you most likely to broadcast or consume at a time. it's not a true dialog. it made FOMO a thing. and worse, it's not only used for showing good, But it's being used to make complicated world events into bite-size good/bad dividing humanity instead of embracing and considering the complexity.


This is pretty typical of life in small villages across southeast Asia, especially towns along the coast have fish/cashew nuts lady as opposed to the yogurt lady. She was the local news representative and also the beacon of acceptable levels of capitalism -- would price her products with just enough margin for her to enjoy her simple life.


[flagged]


This is a bit concerning. Did you skip everything besides "yogurt delivery", or you don't agree someone talking to you regularly is counter-loneliness?


Maybe get some help. People don’t construe an innocent life sharing in this hostile way


Yes? Did you genuinely read the article or posts in this thread?


Did you not read the parent? Talking through your problems with another human being alleviates the feeling of loneliness.


I've been spending much less time on reviews lately. I used to check if the code was correct and well-written, and worked on my local machine as expected and performed well. But I can't do it anymore. If they can vibe-code, why can't I vibe-review? Maybe something wrong will happen in production, but it's not my responsibility. I also stopped volunteering for on-call (well, I shouldn't in the first place). If I noticed someone reporting a bug in production during non-working hours, I investigated and implemented the solution, usually faster than coworkers. I thought it was my responsibility to contribute to the product if I could, even though it was beyond my job description. Working with AI-generated code really demoralized me and I can't love the product I'm working on anymore.


I agree, but in general those chat apps have relatively bad user experiences for multibillion BtoC company. I used to have a lot of surprises and frustrations while using Claude Code / Desktop, and still encounter issues, but it's the best in major LLM services.


It's funny cause, you know, fixing all those little nitty gritty things should be practically automatic with their own offerings... have your agent put in a lot of instrumentation... have it chase down bugs or dead-end user-journeys... have it go make the changes to fix it...

I've seen these tools work for this kinda stuff sometimes... you'd think nobody would be better at it than the creators of the tools.


lol but it’s definitely happening. Some services are solely for llm consumption and human is not a welcomed customer.


But in the stock market, it is almost impossible for companies like Anthropic or any successful startups not to become villains (profit first no matter what). Anthropic especially needs to burn huge amount of money, so they need a lot of funding. The only way to keep founders' idealism is probably to copy Zuckerberg. Divide stocks with and without voting-power and trade only no-voting stocks.


I'm not denying 95% of that, only saying that Zuckerberg didn't have any idealism to lose in the first place.


I actually forgot that his first site was facemash which single purpose was to rate "hotness" of each individual girl on his University.


Anthropic is not a public company.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: