Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

From the technical specs, it's almost certainly the i.MX 8, which as far as I know is not affected or listed on any of the errata for that vulnerability.


I missed the part on the tech page that listed the A72, so yeah it's an iMX8.

Hopefully the HAB fix is the reason for the 8. Otherwise this seems like overkill for the work involved.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: