> What do "proponents of shell spawning" dislike about the activate command?
For me, it modifies my existing shell in ways that I don't fully understand. While I've never had any issues with that, I have experienced similar problems in the past with RVM and they were incredibly difficult to debug.
Using the OS's tooling to create an isolated environment seems to fit much better with the "Unix philosophy" than modifying the existing one.
For me, it modifies my existing shell in ways that I don't fully understand. While I've never had any issues with that, I have experienced similar problems in the past with RVM and they were incredibly difficult to debug.
Using the OS's tooling to create an isolated environment seems to fit much better with the "Unix philosophy" than modifying the existing one.