[...] Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith. [...]
Interpret what you want. The comment was upfront very low effort and derogatory.
Wacom makes premium products for professionals, is a vendor for their premium digitziers and uncontroversial. You don't need two minutes to find what products they make to find that ADs are not remotely viable on the hardware.
The comment was hastily posted and lazy and for that one can assume that the poster did not own the products and I was correct, so read what was posted before coming to your conclusion that what my comment was done in bad faith.
Nowhere else in article or comments under it has anyone mentioned the possibilty of ADs on a drawing tablet or the digitizer hardware they provide for many products outside of their own. It is like saying because you bought a Mac that Apple can use your data for advertising even though they explicitly said they use it for product development.
There is no strong interpretation or defense of that person's comment. If you have a strong interpretation of that post that you want to add, put a comment with the interpretation or go to another and ignore this one thanks!
[...] Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith. [...]