Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Unlikely if the firm's size lets it offer better life than alternatives

How do you figure? This implies the compensation is different from other "firm"s.

> Hard if a firm's size grants it the ability to challenge monopoly on violence.

How do you figure? Monopoly typically implies private property.

> No longer possible if the firm is large enough to have vertical integration.

How do you figure? Monopoly typically implies private property.



How does one seize a firm's assets if a firm has no private property? That implies the firm has nothing to seize because it has nothing.


> How does one seize a firm's assets if a firm has no private property? That implies the firm has nothing to seize because it has nothing.

Well the traditional linguistic connotations of possession certainly persist. Here "seize" simply means take control of.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: