> Presumably cost analysis has been done and the cost of buying land through compulsory purchase is far higher than tunnelling. Crazy, but true.
Nope. The tunnelling is uneconomic, but locals were able to ban the line from being built on the surface on the grounds that it's in a designated Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (a status that is disproportionately applied in the rich south of the country).
Nope. The tunnelling is uneconomic, but locals were able to ban the line from being built on the surface on the grounds that it's in a designated Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (a status that is disproportionately applied in the rich south of the country).