We should consider technologies a public good once they go over some threshold of users, they should then eiter be nationalized or regulated as public or broken up.
So then what if social networks capped the number of users at 1 below that threshold? For example, if nationalization occurs at 1 million users, what if all social networks limited the number of accounts to 999,999?.
Personally I think that would be awesome. Imagine if every town, city, and borough of very large cities had their own independent social network or networks.
You could do it the same way you would break up the banks. Just put a tax on companies with more users than e.g. 1M. Instead of a systemic risk tax, make it a data security tax; because once you're past a certain size, the negative externalities caused by a security failure justify the tax.
Yes, we would go back from platforms to protocols and the internet would be good again.
As for when a technology become good? There are a lot of possible criteria, but that doesn't really matter we can come up with a fuzzy cut off and any transparent criteria for it would be preferrable to the current state.
> [W]hat if all social networks limited the number of accounts to 999,999?
That's interesting. It opens the door to the possibility that social networks might pay people to leave, in order to open spaces for more long-term-valuable customers.
