A portion of the community only reads the headlines and forms their opinion based on that alone, I'm not saying it's right, I'm just trying to add some context to what appears to be your incredulity at the parent commenter's question.

I read the whole article, but didn't read the entirety of the separate element that first contained the link to the article as printer friendly text.

There's a pretty big UX failure to stick important content there.

I read the whole article and then came here to ask if anyone knew the court and case number. Now I feel stupid.

It's not live on PACER yet sadly so I can't get a case number.