Society is meant to overcome individual shortcomings via constructive collaboration.
Adding individual strengths, not weaknesses, necessitates adherence to some rules in open communication. Science should know explicitly how to do that.
Wherefore I mentioned how the same might be accomplished without them, simply by listenening and explaining to each other.
Of course, if you assume individual experts to be really entrenched in their particular fields and entirely unable to bridge the gaps between them, you might be dependent on such talent.
I have never seen a job offering to that effect though?
Adding individual strengths, not weaknesses, necessitates adherence to some rules in open communication. Science should know explicitly how to do that.