You've just touched upon why this hasn't worked in the past. With Chevron the interpretation was left up to the agency, and courts never got to decide anything.
Without Chevron, the courts will now be able to do exactly what you're suggesting.
You're _actually_ in favor of disabling Chevron, which the SC just did.
You've just touched upon why this hasn't worked in the past. With Chevron the interpretation was left up to the agency, and courts never got to decide anything.
Without Chevron, the courts will now be able to do exactly what you're suggesting.
You're _actually_ in favor of disabling Chevron, which the SC just did.