It's explained already. That you don't know and are asking this question really means you didn't spend any time researching the case. Maybe if you were going to kill someone, you would do more research, don't you think?
Like how Missouri said it needed to do more research before killing him?
And then before the group designated to do that could render a conclusion, they were disbanded and then he was killed?
Meaning, Missouri said "We don't know enough about this and should research further, but instead of reading the results, we are just going to kill someone?"
So real the question is: why do you support the government killing someone they say they need more information on before killing them but deciding to kill them anyways?
It's explained already. That you don't know and are asking this question really means you didn't spend any time researching the case. Maybe if you were going to kill someone, you would do more research, don't you think?
Like how Missouri said it needed to do more research before killing him?
And then before the group designated to do that could render a conclusion, they were disbanded and then he was killed?
Meaning, Missouri said "We don't know enough about this and should research further, but instead of reading the results, we are just going to kill someone?"
So real the question is: why do you support the government killing someone they say they need more information on before killing them but deciding to kill them anyways?