> Its one NGO trying to dictate what "open source" is
If you're referring to the OSI, they're the ones who invented the term “open source” in the first place, and are authoritative on what counts as “open source” and what doesn't.
> and btw. according to that definition, Qwen isn't open source.
Well yes, the lack of open-sourcing being the context of this thread :)
Luckily, it seems previous Qwen models did get open-sourced in the actual sense, so this one probably will be, too.