Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Thought the one I got was really funny so I peeked at the source. Maybe that second 32 <= score < 35 text is a work-in-progress? :)

20>score?

Here's a fun fact: If you just blindly clicked 'yes' for every answer, you'd have scored better. But don't beat yourself up about it. I mean, you might hit someone else by accident.

23>score?

Sigh. Oh well. At least no one got hurt. That's the best we can take from that.

25>score?

That performance was like the film Taken 2. You went in guns blazing but the result was, well, ugh. Wouldn't buy you on DVD.

29>score?

Not too bad. If you were my child you'd be my second favourite. Even if I only had one child.

32>score?

Pretty damn good. There's a lot of gotchas in there that you managed to avoid.

35>score?

Difficult to criticise that score without being childish, so: Hahaha points you're a massive nerd.

35>score?

Wow, that was impressive! You hardly tripped up at all. Give yourself a gold star.

// Else:

You cheated. You cheated and I hate you.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: