I don't really HN want to be a place that companies think they can reach developers, whether for surveys or advertising. It's an extremely slippery slope to being a marketing channel, and then the gaming of the system begins.

>What?! msft + node.js?! Crazy talk. >Crazy indeed...

the worst.

> [P.S. random 50 survey participants will get $5 towards caffeine or whatever else you like at Starbucks]

Your submission and responses read as if you already consumed the $250 of caffeine yourself. Can we tone it down a bit? It's 9am. :-)

Submitted my response.

Thanks for the response. <- no exclamation point, just for you

My manager always jokes that I have caffeine running through my veins, so you're not too far off the mark ;-)

Hey, not everyone is in the same timezone!

I wasnt aware that AngularJS is considered a nodejs technology.

for that matter, why is NPM on that list? who uses node without using NPM?

That's a fun question :-). Technically it's not, but we're interested in supporting the entire node.js dev experience. One of the advantages of node.js is the ability to move between client side and server side code without switching contexts, so we want to ensure we properly support people working on both.

I also personally get the sense that the lines are being blurred between node and JavaScript (especially now that Npm brands itself as the JavaScript package manager). Curious if anyone else feels that way?

And yeah... You're right... Id be pretty surprised if anyone used node without Npm... Well at least it might serve as an indicator that someone read the question and wasn't just checking random boxes :-)

Using npm to manage package dependencies, and browserify to bundle those dependencies for the browser, is such a good client-side development experience that I use it even if I have no other use for node. I guess sometimes I'm using npm "without" node (which is to say, I'm not always running a server).

Amen to that.

I don't like surveys, but I can tell you this. ES6 all the way down. ES7 async stuff looks great. facebook flow looks promising

take a look at 6to5 project

awesome, thx for the pointers!

I can't fill out the survey right now but I like ClojureScript. I'd love a ParEdit mode in VS for ClojureScript.

Disappointed edit: Your account has given answers on a range of Microsoft-related topics with different writing styles (rather decaf at first). Have multiple people at Microsoft used this account?

mousetraps?! This account - the one I'm posting on now? Haha! Nope, I'm just weird. Sorry to axe the conspiracy theory :-).

Now watch this: My HN account? Nope... sorry to inform you, but I'm just weird. Anyone who knows me will attest to that. I'm generally far too full of energy, but depending on the occasion oscillate between a playful and pensive writing style. Here's my quora page, and a blog post I did earlier this year if you want to cross-check. You'll notice there's a healthy mix of both "caffeinated" and "decaffeinated" Sara. Let me know if you'd like to see any more writing samples :). - https://www.quora.com/Sara-Itani - http://blogs.msdn.com/b/lightswitch/archive/2014/04/17/scala...

Waitaminute... What just happened?!! CAN'T RESOLVE... COGNITIVE... DISSONANCE... MIND... IMPLODING!!!!

It's not so hard, actually. Both writing styles are pretty similar - one is simply more staccato and contains over-the-top faux-dialog with the reader. Usually if I'm trying to construct a convincing argument or reason about an idea while I'm writing it, my writing will turn out more pensive. If I'm super excited (as I was when people were posting awesome feedback,) or trying to get/keep someone's attention - it'll be more energetic/playful. If I want to do both, I'll combine the two.

Make sense? Awesome.

Apologies for the confusion :-). You may now return to your regularly scheduled HN thread.

EDIT: oops - got distracted trying to prove I'm me, and forgot to address the more important part of your message. Thanks so much for the feedback, even if you couldn't take the survey :)

I'm happy to take the survey, it will be interesting to see what MSFT works out over the coming months.

Small pet peeve: It'd be nice if you didn't require input on all forms of the survey, especially the open response text fields. I understand if instant.ly doesn't give you an option.

Thanks, we'll keep that in mind for the next survey. That's something we went back and forth on - those are always some of the most interesting fields, and we didn't want people to consider the field as unimportant and skip it because they were optional. On the other hand, I can see that it would be annoying for it not to tell you you're missing fields until you submit. Maybe we can try editing it tomorrow to do a quick a/b test and see if it has an effect on % (good) responses for those questions...

Unfortunate typo there calling Linux "Linus".

fixed!