Do you intend to turn a technological frustration talk into a gender (in)equality debate?
Personally I got that he's just expressing how absurd would be to see something as odd/complicated as that code trying to solve a problem that is inherently due to the complexity (inefficiency maybe) the current CSS model/spec.
Do you intend to turn a technological frustration talk into a gender (in)equality debate?
Personally I got that he's just expressing how absurd would be to see something as odd/complicated as that code trying to solve a problem that is inherently due to the complexity (inefficiency maybe) the current CSS model/spec.